no this is a yamaha, was used mainly for live gigs before i got a hold of it. Im curious as well to find out how well this things works and sounds. In you opinion, should I chain it like this PC-EQ-Mixer-PC, or PC-Mixer-EQ-PC, for mastering. If I even have the chain correct at all.
there are two things you could do:
1. you could put the EQ after the mixer (because you intend on using it to carve all the channels together for mastering)
or....
2. (this may be considered wacky but I consider the following the best route) - make the EQ your send/insert on the the mixer. This way you can adjust the individual eq gain amount on each channel.
Very interesting. I could possibly do both, if I run each channel of the EQ in stereo. Thanks JVP.
Sorry I haven't completed that article yet.
I had a strange dream last night that I picked my monitors up off of my desk and they sounded clear and as I moved them toward my desk the desk made intense bass frequencies.
I think I need to couple or decouple my monitors.
good idea / bad idea: layering two stereo field expander plugins on the same channel?
For what reason? First one is at max but still isn't enough stereo?Originally Posted by JackVanPimpe
I wouldn't reccomend it, all stereo field things do is adjust the volume relation of out-of-phase vs mono signals. If you are going for a really wide atmospheric pad or something like that try layering a number of similar elements and panning them off each other.
thanks. that was my feeling too. reversing phase twice. logically, will bring you full circle in theory .
My rule of thumb is if you don't know why you're doing something don't do it. What are you doubling up on?
I would say before even thinkin about gettin too technical get a decent set of monitors and soundcard so you can at least hear everything properly, then the techniques you learn you will understand so much better - Pacso - Higher Stakes Rcordings - #tipoftheday
yeah Chili, why don't you get on it already!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote